<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contract for Legal Services vs. Client Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/10/19/contract-for-legal-services-vs-client-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/10/19/contract-for-legal-services-vs-client-plan/</link>
	<description>law for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:22:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Litigation Lawyer Minneapolis</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/10/19/contract-for-legal-services-vs-client-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-62993</link>
		<dc:creator>Litigation Lawyer Minneapolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=1139#comment-62993</guid>
		<description>Great ideas. I like your client focus.

I generally use a &quot;retainer agreement&quot; for all matters. One retainer agreement form is for litigation and other matters requiring a retainer fee. The other form is for fixed-fee matters. I understand the rationale for not calling the fixed-fee agreement a &quot;retainer agreement,&quot; but in my view, the client is still retaining me: this document records that I have been retained for an attorney-client relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great ideas. I like your client focus.</p>
<p>I generally use a &#8220;retainer agreement&#8221; for all matters. One retainer agreement form is for litigation and other matters requiring a retainer fee. The other form is for fixed-fee matters. I understand the rationale for not calling the fixed-fee agreement a &#8220;retainer agreement,&#8221; but in my view, the client is still retaining me: this document records that I have been retained for an attorney-client relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Flusche</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/10/19/contract-for-legal-services-vs-client-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-62942</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Flusche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=1139#comment-62942</guid>
		<description>@Chuck - I generally like the &quot;retainer agreement&quot; title.  But it confuses me, due to the technical meaning of &quot;retainer&quot; in the context of legal fees.  Since a &quot;retainer&quot; fee is paid to reserve an attorney&#039;s time, it seems appropriate that a &quot;retainer agreement&quot; would be an agreement where the client is paying a retainer fee.

I know that&#039;s nit-picky.  You can retain someone&#039;s services without the technical meaning of the legal fee system.

Thanks for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chuck &#8211; I generally like the &#8220;retainer agreement&#8221; title.  But it confuses me, due to the technical meaning of &#8220;retainer&#8221; in the context of legal fees.  Since a &#8220;retainer&#8221; fee is paid to reserve an attorney&#8217;s time, it seems appropriate that a &#8220;retainer agreement&#8221; would be an agreement where the client is paying a retainer fee.</p>
<p>I know that&#8217;s nit-picky.  You can retain someone&#8217;s services without the technical meaning of the legal fee system.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/10/19/contract-for-legal-services-vs-client-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-62933</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=1139#comment-62933</guid>
		<description>We call them retainer agreements.  Somehow an agreement has a better interpretation than an contract.  An agreement seems to mean that there is an agreement between a couple of people, and a contract has a meaning similar to &quot;we have taken out a contract on you&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We call them retainer agreements.  Somehow an agreement has a better interpretation than an contract.  An agreement seems to mean that there is an agreement between a couple of people, and a contract has a meaning similar to &#8220;we have taken out a contract on you&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres Berger</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/10/19/contract-for-legal-services-vs-client-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-62890</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=1139#comment-62890</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the quick tip, quite often you forget how some of your earlier written documents may not be up to par. Which reminds me I need to go back and tweak mine. 

Thanks for the reminder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the quick tip, quite often you forget how some of your earlier written documents may not be up to par. Which reminds me I need to go back and tweak mine. </p>
<p>Thanks for the reminder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Flusche</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/10/19/contract-for-legal-services-vs-client-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-62879</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Flusche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=1139#comment-62879</guid>
		<description>@Veronica - I&#039;m glad you like it.  I thought it was hilarious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Veronica &#8211; I&#8217;m glad you like it.  I thought it was hilarious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veronica</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/10/19/contract-for-legal-services-vs-client-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-62876</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=1139#comment-62876</guid>
		<description>This picture of sandwich face is quite funny. I remember when I used to make some these when I was a kid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This picture of sandwich face is quite funny. I remember when I used to make some these when I was a kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanGTD</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/10/19/contract-for-legal-services-vs-client-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-62811</link>
		<dc:creator>DanGTD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=1139#comment-62811</guid>
		<description>Nice tip.
It will put the emphasis on what you are going to do for the client, instead on creating a negative impression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice tip.<br />
It will put the emphasis on what you are going to do for the client, instead on creating a negative impression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spearypearl</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/10/19/contract-for-legal-services-vs-client-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-62737</link>
		<dc:creator>Spearypearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=1139#comment-62737</guid>
		<description>The post is good. There will be growth only when others try to hinder us. A good and healthy competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post is good. There will be growth only when others try to hinder us. A good and healthy competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
