<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biggest Jerk Award Goes to LexisNexis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/</link>
	<description>law for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:58:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: High Speed Satellite Internet Service Providers</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/comment-page-1/#comment-64504</link>
		<dc:creator>High Speed Satellite Internet Service Providers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=999#comment-64504</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Fullman</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/comment-page-1/#comment-64424</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Fullman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=999#comment-64424</guid>
		<description>I also think they hired a bad SEO team. Oh well, tough luck right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think they hired a bad SEO team. Oh well, tough luck right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Charles Legit</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/comment-page-1/#comment-64291</link>
		<dc:creator>B Charles Legit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=999#comment-64291</guid>
		<description>I used this service for many years as an investigator and could not stand the corporate culture.  This is not surprising to me at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used this service for many years as an investigator and could not stand the corporate culture.  This is not surprising to me at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LexisNexis Apologizes for Bad Link Tactics &#171; Legal Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/comment-page-1/#comment-62472</link>
		<dc:creator>LexisNexis Apologizes for Bad Link Tactics &#171; Legal Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=999#comment-62472</guid>
		<description>[...] week ago, I gave LexisNexis the biggest jerk award. Basically, they ticked me off with what I consider impolite link building [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week ago, I gave LexisNexis the biggest jerk award. Basically, they ticked me off with what I consider impolite link building [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Flusche</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/comment-page-1/#comment-62471</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Flusche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=999#comment-62471</guid>
		<description>@Shawn - Yes, a follow up post is in the works.  Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shawn &#8211; Yes, a follow up post is in the works.  Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/comment-page-1/#comment-62467</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=999#comment-62467</guid>
		<description>So, are you going to give Lexis credit for contacting you and following up with their contractor who sent the offending message?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, are you going to give Lexis credit for contacting you and following up with their contractor who sent the offending message?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Flusche</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/comment-page-1/#comment-62460</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Flusche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=999#comment-62460</guid>
		<description>@Nick - Thank you for the response.  I greatly appreciate LexisNexis taking responsibility for this inappropriate email, and I&#039;m glad to hear that you are improving these things for the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nick &#8211; Thank you for the response.  I greatly appreciate LexisNexis taking responsibility for this inappropriate email, and I&#8217;m glad to hear that you are improving these things for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/comment-page-1/#comment-62456</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=999#comment-62456</guid>
		<description>Hello Andrew,
 
As the person responsible for Traffic &amp; Alliances here at the LexisNexis Client Development organization, including the optimization of our web properties, I wanted to follow up here with some information that may be helpful.  

First, we do leverage a consultant to perform optimization outreach initiatives.  This would include notifying influencers such as you about our sites/new releases and, if you choose, linking to the appropriate pages utilizing relevant keywords.  We strive to both practice and preach best search practices within the legal community as described in this Law.com article authored several weeks ago:  www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/in_house_tech/pubArticleIHT.jsp?id=1202423253023  
 
Second, I fully agree that the email you received was cold and inappropriate, and for that I apologize.  We have taken steps with our consultant to eliminate this process and encourage more personalized outreach for our product releases.
 
Regards,
Nick Karrat
Senior Director, Traffic &amp; Alliances
LexisNexis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Andrew,</p>
<p>As the person responsible for Traffic &amp; Alliances here at the LexisNexis Client Development organization, including the optimization of our web properties, I wanted to follow up here with some information that may be helpful.  </p>
<p>First, we do leverage a consultant to perform optimization outreach initiatives.  This would include notifying influencers such as you about our sites/new releases and, if you choose, linking to the appropriate pages utilizing relevant keywords.  We strive to both practice and preach best search practices within the legal community as described in this Law.com article authored several weeks ago:  <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/in_house_tech/pubArticleIHT.jsp?id=1202423253023">http://www.law.com/jsp/legalte.....2423253023</a>  </p>
<p>Second, I fully agree that the email you received was cold and inappropriate, and for that I apologize.  We have taken steps with our consultant to eliminate this process and encourage more personalized outreach for our product releases.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Nick Karrat<br />
Senior Director, Traffic &amp; Alliances<br />
LexisNexis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: health</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/comment-page-1/#comment-62445</link>
		<dc:creator>health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=999#comment-62445</guid>
		<description>Please you are not being petty at all.  They have some crazy guts to ask you to change the anchor text for the links.  I don&#039;t have any links to them but I really hope that the readers here do remove their links.  You are doing them a favor and they say that your favor needs to meet their favor guidelines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please you are not being petty at all.  They have some crazy guts to ask you to change the anchor text for the links.  I don&#8217;t have any links to them but I really hope that the readers here do remove their links.  You are doing them a favor and they say that your favor needs to meet their favor guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Flusche</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2008/08/29/biggest-jerk-award-goes-to-lexisnexis/comment-page-1/#comment-62438</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Flusche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/?p=999#comment-62438</guid>
		<description>I have actually been contacted by a guy from Lexis.  We&#039;ll see what happens....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have actually been contacted by a guy from Lexis.  We&#8217;ll see what happens&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
