<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawyers Must Safeguard Techie Property Too!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalandrew.com/2007/01/23/lawyers-must-safeguard-techie-property-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2007/01/23/lawyers-must-safeguard-techie-property-too/</link>
	<description>law for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:49:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cialis</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2007/01/23/lawyers-must-safeguard-techie-property-too/comment-page-1/#comment-13988</link>
		<dc:creator>cialis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/2007/01/23/lawyers-must-safeguard-techie-property-too/#comment-13988</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;cialis...&lt;/strong&gt;

news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>cialis&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Flusche</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2007/01/23/lawyers-must-safeguard-techie-property-too/comment-page-1/#comment-3147</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Flusche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/2007/01/23/lawyers-must-safeguard-techie-property-too/#comment-3147</guid>
		<description>Brent,

You&#039;re absolutely right.  It looks like you have an interesting service there.  I might have to look into that more in the future.

Thanks for commenting,
Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right.  It looks like you have an interesting service there.  I might have to look into that more in the future.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting,<br />
Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.legalandrew.com/2007/01/23/lawyers-must-safeguard-techie-property-too/comment-page-1/#comment-3146</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalandrew.com/2007/01/23/lawyers-must-safeguard-techie-property-too/#comment-3146</guid>
		<description>Another important issue to keep in mind is that standard email is not secure.  Messages can be intercepted and the contents can be read.  So if you are emailing a client&#039;s information, make sure that you have a secure method of doing this.  There are secure email vendors or you can use a secure document exchange program like the one from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawdex.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lawdex&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another important issue to keep in mind is that standard email is not secure.  Messages can be intercepted and the contents can be read.  So if you are emailing a client&#8217;s information, make sure that you have a secure method of doing this.  There are secure email vendors or you can use a secure document exchange program like the one from <a href="http://www.lawdex.com">Lawdex</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
